-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid some InferCtxt::build
calls
#104920
Conversation
aa24d83
to
62504d4
Compare
r=me |
62504d4
to
a68eae2
Compare
@bors r+ |
⌛ Testing commit a68eae2 with merge 2ed85c740f8cdc6c9dd760284e02777165cac152... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The queue is short and the failure looks unrelated...? @bors retry |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
1 similar comment
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (b9341bf): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. |
…=jackh726 Avoid some `InferCtxt::build` calls Either because we're inside of an `InferCtxt` already, or because we're not in a place where we'd ever see inference vars. r? types
Either because we're inside of an
InferCtxt
already, or because we're not in a place where we'd ever see inference vars.r? types